Why "Full Control" May Be an Illusion—And How AI-Powered Scraping Gives You More Control, Not Less
A summer-break reflection on autonomy, delegation, and the real trade-offs in modern web scraping
Summer vacation is in full swing here, my family is off on a two-day scooter tour of Balinese waterfalls and mountain roads, and the house is suddenly silent enough for my own thoughts to get loud. I'm spending the spare hours writing, reading, and tinkering—exactly the conditions under which odd questions about control start bubbling up.
The conversation that sparked this reflection
Earlier this week, I asked my new Dev Engagement Manager, John Watson Rooney (yes, the YouTube influencer, welcome, John), why some developers still hesitate to use AI-powered automated web scraping tools like Zyte API. In my interactions with developers in the Extract Data Discord, they often reply
"I want full control over my code."
That sentiment keeps resurfacing in every scraping community I frequent. This got me thinking about Stephen Ango's brilliant piece "Don't Delegate Understanding", where he warns against outsourcing critical thinking to systems that extract value from your ignorance. But I think we need to examine what we mean by "control" and whether we're fighting for the right things.
AI-powered scraping tools actually give you more strategic control than traditional approaches, not less. Let me show you what I mean.
The smart delegation you're already doing
Think about your current web scraping stack for a moment. If you're running any serious data extraction operation, you're probably already using:
Third-party proxy services for IP rotation instead of building your rotating proxy management system.
Cloud providers for infrastructure, rather than managing your data centres
Browser automation frameworks you didn't build (Selenium, Playwright, Puppeteer)
Anti-detection services with proprietary algorithms for fingerprint and CAPTCHA management
You've delegated the implementation of these incredibly complex systems to specialists. And that's smart! Building a rotating proxy management system or developing sophisticated anti-bot detection is not your core competency.
This isn't about losing control—it's about choosing where to apply your control efforts.
The AI paradox in our development workflow
Here's where it gets even more interesting. We developers are already using AI tools in our development workflow:
Cursor for AI-assisted coding
ChatGPT for problem-solving
Claude for code review
Copilot for autocompletion
We've embraced AI augmentation in our development workflow, recognising that these tools amplify our capabilities rather than diminish them. We maintain agency over the strategic decisions while letting AI handle the tactical implementation.
Yet when it comes to web scraping, there's resistance to AI-powered tools—even when they offer more granular control than traditional approaches.
What control looks like with modern web scraping tools like Zyte API
Let me be precise about it. With Zyte API, the system automatically handles proxy rotation (switching from data centre to residential proxies when needed, cost-optimised per website), anti-bot protection (bans, captchas, fingerprinting), and browser automation (which you can toggle on/off and customise with your own actions). The AI-powered extraction means no CSS selectors or XPaths to write or maintain, and when websites change their layouts, the system adapts automatically.
You make an API call and get structured data back:
You get back structured product data, article content, job listings, or SERP results according to standardised schemas. When you need something custom beyond the standard schema, you define it as a custom attribute, and the AI handles the extraction logic.
But here's the key: you maintain complete control over what actually matters. You define custom attributes for any data fields beyond the standard schemas. You control data quality standards and validation logic. You decide when to use AI extraction versus when to fall back to custom parsing for edge cases – it's as easy as adding a single argument to the above snippet to request the page HTML.
You're not giving up control—you're gaining leverage. You control the what and the how (data requirements, business logic, custom attributes), while the system handles the where and the when (infrastructure, adaptation, maintenance that used to consume most of your development time).
The evolution: From Scrapy to AI-powered templates
Understanding Zyte's evolution helps explain why this approach works. The journey went:
Scrapy (2008): Open-source framework that prioritised developer productivity and accessibility over raw performance
Scrapy Cloud: A hosted platform that eliminates infrastructure management
Zyte API: AI-powered extraction that eliminates parsing code
Zyte AI Scraping: Full automation with configurable templates
The latest innovation combines all of these. Using AI-powered spider templates, you can start extracting data from e-commerce websites within seconds, without the need for ongoing maintenance. These templates can be customised by developers and then configured by non-developers through a user-friendly UI.
What's remarkable about this system is that templates ensure scraping adheres to best practices, maintaining data accuracy, while developers save time by reusing templates and non-developers access data without technical barriers.
Two paths, same destination: strategic control
Whether you choose surgical AI extraction (Zyte API) or full pipeline automation (Zyte AI Web Scraping), both approaches solve the same control paradox in different ways:
Zyte API: Infrastructure + Parsing Automation
You maintain spider architecture, crawling logic, and data pipelines. The API handles proxy management, anti-bot protection, browser automation, and parsing. Since extraction is AI-powered, website layout changes don't break your spiders.
Zyte AI Web Scraping: Complete Template Automation
You define data requirements and target sites. Set up crawlers/spiders in minutes, customise through Page Objects when needed, using pre-built templates, scale to hundreds or thousands of sites effortlessly.
In both cases, you focus on strategic decisions (business requirements, data quality, custom attributes) while delegating tactical implementation (infrastructure, parsing, maintenance).
Understanding vs. implementation
This connects to Stephen Ango's brilliant piece about not delegating understanding, where he warns against outsourcing critical thinking to systems that extract value from your ignorance. But I think we need to distinguish between delegating understanding and delegating implementation.
When you use a third-party proxy service, you should understand how proxy rotation works, why you need it, and how it fits into your architecture. But you don't need to implement your own global proxy network.
Similarly, with AI-powered extraction, you should understand your data requirements, your target schemas, and your business logic. But you don't need to reinvent parsing algorithms or maintain CSS selectors that break every time a website updates.
Understanding you should keep:
Your data requirements and business logic
How web scraping fits into your architecture
The websites you're targeting and their compliance requirements
Your data quality standards and validation needs
Implementation you can delegate:
DOM parsing algorithms and selector optimisation
Browser fingerprinting and anti-detection strategies
Proxy rotation and session management
Template maintenance and website adaptation
The resistance to AI-powered web scraping tools often stems from conflating these two very different types of control.
The question isn't whether to delegate—it's what to delegate and what to keep.
How modern tools preserve your options
Maybe the resistance isn't really about control at all. Maybe it's about trust, transparency, and the fear of building on shifting ground.
Traditional scraping gives you the feeling of control because you can see every line of code. But that code is often fragile, constantly breaking, and requires endless maintenance. You control the code, but the code doesn't actually control the outcome.
Modern AI-powered tools like Zyte API are designed to preserve your control options:
Override automatic extraction for specific fields when needed
Fall back to custom parsing for edge cases
Mix AI extraction with selectors for hybrid approaches
Define custom business logic for data validation and processing
Maintain multiple providers to avoid vendor lock-in
You're not locked into black-box decisions. You have escape hatches and fallback options at every level.
Where the resistance really lies
After talking to hundreds of developers, I think the hesitation comes from a few specific places:
Black box anxiety: Not understanding how AI extraction works under the hood
Vendor lock-in fears: Worry about being dependent on proprietary systems
Cost uncertainty: Unclear pricing models compared to predictable infrastructure costs
Quality scepticism: Doubt that AI can match hand-crafted selectors
Control misidentification: Confusing tactical control (writing selectors) with strategic control (defining requirements)
Most of these concerns are addressable through education and transparency. For instance, Zyte's composite AI architecture combines probabilistic LLMs with deterministic ML models, so you can balance control, cost, and flexibility rather than relying purely on unpredictable LLM behaviour.
Spreading awareness: making the abstract concrete
The real challenge isn't technical—it's helping developers understand what modern AI-powered scraping actually looks like in practice. Too many still think it means "throw HTML at an LLM and hope for the best."
The reality is much more sophisticated: AI-powered spider templates come with built-in support for products, articles, jobs, and SERPs, with pre-built crawling and parsing logic including pagination and navigation. You can mix ML for common fields with selectors or custom LLM prompts for anything outside the standard schema.
This layered approach gives you more control than traditional scraping, not less.
An invitation to rethink control
I'm genuinely curious about your perspective on this. Are we clinging to an outdated notion of control? Is there wisdom in the resistance that I'm missing?
What would convince you that AI-powered extraction gives you more control, not less?
Here are the questions I keep wrestling with:
Where do you draw the "must-keep-control" line in your stack?
Have AI extractors ever burned you? What happened?
Would more transparency into AI decision-making change your perspective?
What's the difference between controlling implementation and controlling outcomes?
Join the conversation
This is exactly the kind of nuanced discussion I want to have more of. If you're interested in diving deeper into these topics, John hosted a live discussion on YouTube where we explored different approaches to AI-powered extraction and how you can use the custom attributes feature in the Zyte API.
I'd love to hear your thoughts, whether you're team "full control," team "smart delegation," or somewhere in between.
What's your take? Do we need to rethink what "control" means in the age of AI?
Hit reply—I genuinely want to understand where the resistance comes from and how we can build better tools that give developers the control they actually need.
TL;DR: Total control is often a comforting myth. The real question isn't whether to delegate, but what to delegate and what to keep. We can obsess over tactical control (CSS selectors that break constantly) or focus on strategic control (data quality, business requirements, outcomes). AI-powered tools aren't taking control away—they're shifting where we apply our control efforts.
P.S. If you want to understand what modern AI-powered web scraping- Zyte AI Web Scraping actually looks like under the hood, I've written detailed articles about the evolution of web scraping infrastructure, how to build 30 scrapers in 30 minutes, and deep customisation techniques. Check out the Zyte API docs or try the AI spider templates that let you scrape 30 e-commerce sites in 30 minutes. But this piece is about the bigger questions these tools raise about control, autonomy, and what we choose to optimise for.
 | A guest post by
|